Lifetime blast exposure is not related to cognitive performance or psychiatric symptoms in US military personnel.

Objective: The present study aimed to examine the impact of lifetime blast exposure (LBE) on neuropsychological functioning in service members and veterans (SMVs). Method: Participants were 282 SMVs, with and without history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), who were prospectively enrolled in a Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC)-Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence (TBICoE) Longitudinal TBI Study. A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data was conducted. LBE was based on two factors: Military Occupational Speciality (MOS) and SMV self-report. Participants were divided into three groups based on LBE: Blast Naive (n = 61), Blast + Low Risk MOS (n = 96), Blast + High Risk MOS (n = 125). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to examine group differences on neurocognitive domains and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in attention/working memory, processing speed, executive functioning, and memory (Fs < 1.75, ps > .1, ηp2s < .032) or in General Cognition (Fs < 0.95, ps > .3, ηp2s < .008). Prior to correction for covariates, lifetime blast exposure was related to Restructured Clinical (F(18,542) = 1.77, p = .026, ηp2 = .055), Somatic/Cognitive (F(10,550) = 1.99, p = .033, ηp2 = .035), and Externalizing Scales (F(8,552) = 2.17, p = .028, ηp2 = .030); however, these relationships did not remain significant after correction for covariates (Fs < 1.53, ps > .145, ηp2s < .032). Conclusions: We did not find evidence of a relationship between LBE and neurocognitive performance or psychiatric symptoms. This stands in contrast to prior studies demonstrating an association between lifetime blast exposure and highly sensitive blood biomarkers and/or neuroimaging. Overall, findings suggest the neuropsychological impact of lifetime blast exposure is minimal in individuals remaining in or recently retired from military service.

Cumulative Blast Exposure During a Military Career Negatively Impacts Recovery from Traumatic Brain Injury.

Sub-concussive injuries have emerged as an important factor in the long-term brain health of athletes and military personnel. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between service member and veterans (SMVs) lifetime blast exposure and recovery from a traumatic brain injury (TBI). A total of 558 SMVs with a history of TBI were examined. Lifetime blast exposure (LBE) was based on self-report (M = 79.4, standard deviation = 392.6; range = 0-7500) categorized into three groups: Blast Naive (n = 121), Low LBE (n = 223; LBE range 1-9), and High LBE (n = 214; LBE >10). Dependent variables were the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian (PCL-C) and the Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (TBI-QOL). Analyses controlled for demographic factors (age, gender, and race) as well as TBI factors (months since index TBI, index TBI severity, and total number lifetime TBIs). The Blast Naive group had significantly lower NSI and PCL-C scores compared with the Low LBE group and High LBE group, with small to medium effect sizes. On the TBI-QOL, the Blast Naïve group had better quality life on 10 of the 14 scales examined. The Low LBE did not differ from the High LBE group on the PCL-C, NSI, or TBI-QOL. Blast exposure over an SMV's career was associated with increased neurobehavioral and post-traumatic stress symptoms following a TBI. The influence of psychological trauma associated with blasts may be an important factor influencing symptoms as well as the accuracy of self-reported estimates of LBE.

High Lifetime Blast Exposure Using the Blast Exposure Threshold Survey Is Associated With Worse Warfighter Brain Health Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

The purpose of this study was to extend previous research by examining the relationship between lifetime blast exposure and neurobehavioral functioning after mild TBI (MTBI) by (a) using a comprehensive measure of lifetime blast exposure, and (b) controlling for the influence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Participants were 103 United States service members and veterans (SMVs) with a medically documented diagnosis of MTBI, recruited from three military treatment facilities (74.8%) and community-based recruitment initiatives (25.2%, e.g., social media, flyers). Participants completed a battery of neurobehavioral measures 12 or more months post-injury (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, PTSD-Checklist PCLC, TBI-Quality of Life), including the Blast Exposure Threshold Survey (BETS). The sample was classified into two lifetime blast exposure (LBE) groups: High (n = 57) and Low (n = 46) LBE. In addition, the sample was classified into four LBE/PTSD subgroups: High PTSD/High LBE (n = 38); High PTSD/Low LBE (n = 19); Low PTSD/High LBE (n = 19); and Low PTSD/Low LBE (n = 27). The High LBE group had consistently worse scores on all neurobehavioral measures compared with the Low LBE group. When controlling for the influence of PTSD (using ANCOVA), however, only a handful of group differences remained. When comparing measures across the four LBE/PTSD subgroups, in the absence of clinically meaningful PTSD symptoms (i.e., Low PTSD), participants with High LBE had worse scores on the majority of neurobehavioral measures (e.g., post-concussion symptoms, sleep, fatigue). When examining the total number of clinically elevated measures, the High LBE subgroup consistently had a greater number of clinically elevated scores compared with the Low LBE subgroup for the majority of comparisons (i.e., four to 15 or more elevated symptoms). In contrast, in the presence of clinically meaningful PTSD symptoms (i.e., High PTSD), there were no differences between High versus Low LBE subgroups for all measures. When examining the total number of clinically elevated measures, however, there were meaningful differences between High versus Low LBE subgroups for those comparisons that included a high number of clinically elevated scores (i.e., six to 10 or more), but not for a low number of clinically elevated scores (i.e., one to five or more). High LBE, as quantified using a more comprehensive measure than utilized in past research (i.e., BETS), was associated with worse overall neurobehavioral functioning after MTBI. This study extends existing literature showing that lifetime blast exposure, that is largely subconcussive, may negatively impact warfighter brain health and readiness beyond diagnosable brain injury.

Lifetime Blast Exposure Is Not Related to White Matter Integrity in Service Members and Veterans With and Without Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

This study examines the impact of lifetime blast exposure on white matter integrity in service members and veterans (SMVs). Participants were 227 SMVs, including those with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI; n = 124), orthopedic injury controls (n = 58), and non-injured controls (n = 45), prospectively enrolled in a Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC)/Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence (TBICoE) study. Participants were divided into three groups based on number of self-reported lifetime blast exposures: none (n = 53); low (i.e., 1-9 blasts; n = 81); and high (i.e., ≥10 blasts; n = 93). All participants underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) at least 11 months post-injury. Tract-of-interest (TOI) analysis was applied to investigate fractional anisotropy and mean, radial, and axial diffusivity (AD) in left and right total cerebral white matter as well as 24 tracts. Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction was used. Regressions investigating blast exposure and mTBI on white matter integrity, controlling for age, revealed that the presence of mTBI history was associated with lower AD in the bilateral superior longitudinal fasciculus and arcuate fasciculus and left cingulum (ßs = -0.255 to -0.174; ps < 0.01); however, when non-injured controls were removed from the sample (but orthopedic injury controls remained), these relationships were attenuated and did not survive FDR correction. Regression models were rerun with modified post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis added as a predictor. After FDR correction, PTSD was not significantly associated with white matter integrity in any of the models. Overall, there was no relationship between white matter integrity and self-reported lifetime blast exposure or PTSD.

The Impact of Lifetime Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) on Mental Health Symptoms among Service Members in Interdisciplinary TBI Programs.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is highly prevalent among active duty service members (ADSMs) and imposes a significant health burden, particularly on mental health (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] and depressive symptoms). Little is known about how TBI setting characteristics impact PTSD and depressive symptom expression in service members undergoing interdisciplinary TBI care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 455 patients enrolled in interdisciplinary, outpatient TBI programs within the military health system. Using Poisson regression with robust error variance, TBI injury setting characteristics (i.e., before military service, during military training, and during noncombat/combat deployment) were evaluated against clinically-elevated PTSD (PTSD Checklist, DSM-5 score ≥ 33) and depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire-8 score ≥ 15) symptoms. RESULTS: In adjusted models, TBI sustained before military service was associated with less likelihood for clinically-elevated PTSD symptoms at pretreatment (prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.76, confidence interval [CI] = 0.60-0.96) and post-treatment (PR = 0.67, CI = 0.52-0.87). TBI sustained during combat deployment, however, resulted in the greatest impact on clinically-elevated pretreatment PTSD (PR = 1.49, CI = 1.16-1.91) and depressive (PR = 1.47, CI = 1.06-2.03) symptoms. Null results were found between military training/noncombat deployment and mental health symptoms. Regardless of the TBI setting, following TBI treatment, there remained 37.5% (n = 180) and 24.8% (n = 108) with clinically-elevated PTSD and depressive symptoms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a differential impact of TBI settings, particularly between TBI sustained before military service and that from combat deployment among ADSMs enrolled in outpatient TBI programs. This may be indicative of differences in the characteristics of these environments (e.g., injury severity) or the impact of such an event during recovery from current TBIs. The large percentage of ADSMs who present with clinically-elevated mental health symptoms after treatment may suggest the need for additional resources to address mental health needs before, during, and after treatment in TBI programs.

Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Blast Exposure Threshold Survey in United States Military Service Members and Veterans.

The Blast Exposure Threshold Survey (BETS) is a recently developed and promising new self-report measure of lifetime blast exposure (LBE). However, there are no studies that have examined the psychometric properties of the BETS, which currently limits its clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the BETS by comparing the BETS Generalized Blast Exposure Value (GBEV) to six variables hypothesized to be associated with LBE (i.e., single-item LBE, combat exposure, years in the military, number of combat deployments, and military occupation specialty [MOS]) and three variables hypothesized not to be associated with LBE (i.e., age at the time of injury, estimated pre-morbid Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient [FSIQ], and resilience). Participants were 202 United States service members and veterans prospectively enrolled from three military medical treatment facilities (68.7%) and via community recruitment initiatives (31.3%). Participants completed the BETS, Combat Exposure Scale (CES), Deployment Risk and Resiliency Inventory-2 Combat Experiences (DRRI-2 CE), Traumatic Brain Injury-Quality of Life Resilience scale, and a brief structured interview. For some analyses, participants were classified into two blast risk MOS groups: high (n = 89) and low (n = 94). The BETS GBEV was not significantly correlated with all three non-blast related variables (rs = 0.01 to rs = -0.12). In contrast, GBEV was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with all blast-related variables; single-item LBE (rs = 0.76), CES (rs = 0.58), number of combat deployments (rs = 0.53), DRRI-2 CE (rs = 0.48), and high blast risk MOS (r = 0.36, medium effect size). However, a stronger relationship was found between the blast-related variables and three modified GBEV scores when excluding some small weapons categories; single-item LBE (rs = 0.80-0.82), CES (rs = 0.64-0.67), number of combat deployments (rs = 0.56), DRRI-2 CE (rs = 0.51-0.53), and high blast risk MOS (r = 0.42-0.49, medium-large effect size). This is the first study to examine the psychometric properties of the BETS. Overall, these results offer support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the BETS. In order to ensure that the BETS can be confidently used as a valid and reliable measure of LBE, more research is needed to further examine the psychometric properties of the test, particularly with regard to the establishment of test-retest reliability.

Therapeutic Relationship in mTBI Rehabilitation: The Disparity Between the Illness Experience and Clinical Definitions.

INTRODUCTION: A positive therapeutic relationship is characterized by trust and mutually perceived genuineness. It is positively associated with patients' adherence to treatment, satisfaction, and health outcomes. When service members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) present to rehabilitation clinics with nonspecific symptoms, a disparity between their experience of disability and clinical expectations of mTBI may disrupt the establishment of a positive therapeutic relationship between patients and providers. The objectives of this study are to (1) explore disparities between military service members and rehabilitation clinicians about the clinical diagnosis and illness experience of mTBI and (2) identify barriers to the establishment of a positive therapeutic relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a qualitative descriptive study of military service members with prior mTBI (n = 18) and clinicians (n = 16) who participated in interviews and focus groups. Data were analyzed thematically using Kleinman's framing of illness experience and clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Three themes reflected the potential breakdowns in the therapeutic relationship. The first theme, clinical expectations for post-injury recovery versus patients' experience of ongoing disability, reflects the inconsistency between clinicians' expectations of symptom resolution within 90 days following mTBI and service members' experiences of symptoms that worsened over several months or years. The second theme, symptom attribution to mental health conditions versus tissue injury, describes the difficulty in attributing symptoms to the physical impact of the mTBI or mental health diagnoses that may also stem from the injury event. The third theme, suspected malingering versus valid disability, describes clinicians' reports of frustration with cases in which they suspected malingering for secondary gains in contrast with service members' feelings that their problems were not taken seriously by clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: This study extended previous research on therapeutic relationships by examining the situation of mTBI rehabilitation services for military service members. The findings reinforce the best practice recommendations of acknowledging patients' experiences, addressing the presenting symptoms and problems, and encouraging progressive return to activity following mTBI. Acknowledgment of and attention to patients' illness experience by rehabilitation clinicians is necessary and important for supporting a positive therapeutic relationship and ultimately to optimize patients' health outcomes and reduce disability.

Risk factors for the presence and persistence of posttraumatic stress symptoms following traumatic brain injury in U.S. service members and veterans.

This study aimed to identify risk factors predictive of the presence and persistence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom reporting following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants were 1,301 U.S. service members and veterans (SMVs) divided into four groups: uncomplicated mild TBI (mTBI; n = 543); complicated mild, moderate, severe, and penetrating TBI (n = 230); injured controls (n = 340); and noninjured controls (n = 188). We examined 25 factors related to demographic, injury-related, military-specific, treatment/health care need, and mental health/social support variables. Seven factors were statistically associated with the presence of DSM-IV-TR symptom criteria for PTSD: premorbid IQ, combat exposure, depression, social participation, history of mTBI, need for managing mood and stress, and need for improving memory and attention, p < .001 (51.3% variance). When comparing the prevalence of these risk factors in a longitudinal cohort (n = 742) across four PTSD trajectory groups (i.e., asymptomatic, improved, developed, persistent), a higher proportion of participants in the persistent PTSD group reported worse depression, a lack of social participation, and history of mTBI. Additionally, a higher proportion of participants in the persistent and developed PTSD groups reported the need for managing mood/stress and improving memory/attention. When considered simultaneously, the presence of ≥ 1 or ≥ 2 risk factors was associated with a higher proportion of participants in the developed and persistent PTSD groups, ps < .001. These risk factors may be useful in identifying SMVs at risk for the development and/or persistence of PTSD symptoms who may need intervention.

Neuromotor changes in participants with a concussion history can be detected with a custom smartphone app.

Neuromotor dysfunction after a concussion is common, but balance tests used to assess neuromotor dysfunction are typically subjective. Current objective balance tests are either cost- or space-prohibitive, or utilize a static balance protocol, which may mask neuromotor dysfunction due to the simplicity of the task. To address this gap, our team developed an Android-based smartphone app (portable and cost-effective) that uses the sensors in the device (objective) to record movement profiles during a stepping-in-place task (dynamic movement). The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which our custom smartphone app and protocol could discriminate neuromotor behavior between concussed and non-concussed participants. Data were collected at two university laboratories and two military sites. Participants included civilians and Service Members (N = 216) with and without a clinically diagnosed concussion. Kinematic and variability metrics were derived from a thigh angle time series while the participants completed a series of stepping-in-place tasks in three conditions: eyes open, eyes closed, and head shake. We observed that the standard deviation of the mean maximum angular velocity of the thigh was higher in the participants with a concussion history in the eyes closed and head shake conditions of the stepping-in-place task. Consistent with the optimal movement variability hypothesis, we showed that increased movement variability occurs in participants with a concussion history, for which our smartphone app and protocol were sensitive enough to capture.

Perspectives on Development of Measures to Estimate Career Blast Exposure History in Service Members and Veterans.

The Department of Defense (DOD) has recently prioritized the investigation of the acute and chronic adverse brain health and performance effects of low-level blast (LLB) generated by the use of weapons systems. While acute exposure can be quantified by sensor technology, career exposure has no widely accepted and validated measure for characterization. Currently, distinct research groups are developing and validating four promising measures to estimate career blast exposure history: the Salisbury Blast Interview, Blast Exposure Threshold Survey, Blast Ordnance and Occupational Exposure Measure, and the Blast Frequency and Symptom Severity. Each measure offers an assessment of blast history that is uniquely beneficial to addressing specific research questions. However, use of divergent strategies is not efficient to accelerate the field's understanding of the impact of career exposure and Service-connected health outcomes. As a DOD-wide solution, collaboration across these groups is required to develop a tool(s) that can be standardized across research studies and, ultimately, pared down to be implemented in clinical settings. Here, we overview the current four measures and provide a perspective on the way forward for optimization and/or combination in support of this solution.

Low resilience following traumatic brain injury is strongly associated with poor neurobehavioral functioning in U.S. military service members and veterans.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between resilience and self-reported neurobehavioral functioning following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in U.S. military service members and veterans (SMVs). A secondary objective was to examine the interaction between resilience and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on neurobehavioral functioning. METHOD: Participants included 795 SMVs classified into four groups: Uncomplicated Mild TBI (MTBI; n=300); Complicated Mild, Moderate, Severe, or Penetrating TBI (STBI, n 162); Injured Controls (IC, n=185); and Non-injured Controls (NIC, n=148). Two independent cohorts were evaluated - those assessed within 1-year of injury and those assessed 10-years post-injury. SMVs completed self-report measures including the PTSD Checklist-Civilian version, Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, and TBI-Quality of Life. RESULTS: Results showed that (1) lower resilience was strongly associated with poorer neurobehavioral functioning across all groups at 1-year and 10-years post-injury, and (2) PTSD and resilience had a robust influence on neurobehavioral functioning at both time periods post-injury, such that SMVs with PTSD and low resilience displayed the poorest neurobehavioral functioning. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that regardless of injury group and time since injury, resilience and PTSD strongly influence neurobehavioral functioning following TBI among SMVs. Future research evaluating interventions designed to enhance resilience in this population is indicated.

Clinical utility of PTSD, resilience, sleep, and blast as risk factors to predict poor neurobehavioral functioning following traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study in U.S. military service members.

PURPOSE: This study examined the clinical utility of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), low resilience, poor sleep, and lifetime blast exposure as risk factors for predicting future neurobehavioral outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Participants were 591 U.S. military service members and veterans who had sustained a TBI (n = 419) or orthopedic injury without TBI (n = 172). Participants completed the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, PTSD Checklist, and the TBI-Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) scale at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: Using the four risk factors at baseline, 15 risk factor combinations were examined by calculating odds ratios to predict poor neurobehavioral outcome at follow-up (i.e., number of abnormal scores across five TBI-QOL scales [e.g., Fatigue, Depression]). The vast majority of risk factor combinations resulted in odds ratios that were considered to be clinically meaningful (i.e., ≥ 2.5) for predicting poor outcome. The risk factor combinations with the highest odds ratios included PTSD singularly, or in combination with poor sleep and/or low resilience (odds ratios = 4.3-72.4). However, poor sleep and low resilience were also strong predictors in the absence of PTSD (odds ratios = 3.1-29.8). CONCLUSION: PTSD, poor sleep, and low resilience, singularly or in combination, may be valuable risk factors that can be used clinically for targeted early interventions.

Presenting symptoms as prognostic measures of mental health recovery among service members with concussion.

Background: Comorbid mental illness may negatively impact recovery from concussion. This study evaluated whether the level of symptom clusters at clinic intake contribute to poor mental health recovery in concussed patients during treatment, which may in turn serve as a target intervention. Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the association between the level of initial symptoms and mental health symptoms among service members with concussion. Methods: Data were obtained from 483 active duty service members treated in interdisciplinary treatment programs for traumatic brain injury, all of which were concussions. Pre-treatment symptom clusters included self-reported hyperarousal, dissociation/depression, cognitive dysfunction/headache and neurological symptoms. The outcomes, clinically-relevant decreases in depressive symptoms (assessed by the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-8) and PTSD symptoms (assessed by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, PCL-5), were defined as a decrease in PHQ-8 > 5 and PCL-5 > 7, respectively. Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to evaluate the relationship between the level of each symptom cluster and clinically-relevant decrease in outcomes. Results: Participants with higher (vs. lower) levels of pre-treatment hyperarousal and dissociation/depression symptom cluster were less likely to improve in depressive and PTSD symptoms during treatment. The level of cognitive/headache and neurological symptom clusters were not significantly associated with any symptom changes. Conclusion: These findings support the need for individualized treatment for symptoms identified and treated after determining concussion history, with particular attention to high levels of hyperarousal and dissociation/depression prior to treatment.

Disparities in mental health symptoms recovery across race/ethnicity and education level following mild traumatic brain injury.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between race/ethnicity and post-concussive mental health (i.e., depressive, post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) and neurobehavioral symptoms among service members, and whether this association differed by education level. Methods: The study sample consisted of 524 patients from a multidisciplinary US military outpatient treatment facility for post-concussive symptoms. Poisson regression with robust error variance was utilized to investigate outcome (i.e., clinically-elevated depressive [Patient Health Questionnaire-8 ≥15], PTSD [PTSD Checklist, DSM 5 ≥38] and neurobehavioral [Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory >75th percentile] symptoms at admission and last follow-up in this cohort study. Modification by education level (low [no college degree] vs. high [associate's degree or higher]) was additionally evaluated. Results: The relationship between race/ethnicity and mental health/neurobehavioral symptoms varied by education level (p-interaction: depressive symptoms = 0.002, PTSD symptoms = 0.035, neurobehavioral symptoms = 0.040). Specifically, non-Whites were at a significantly higher prevalence for clinically-elevated depressive symptoms post-treatment than Whites, but only among those with higher education level (PR = 2.22, CI = 1.37-3.59). A similar trend was demonstrated for PTSD and neurobehavioral symptoms. Conclusion: Military healthcare may need to increase depression-focused treatment options that are acceptable for racial/ethnic minority patients, particularly those with higher education, while they are recovering from comorbid traumatic brain injury.

Impact of Prior Brain Injury on Concussion Recovery in Military Personnel: Evaluation of Timing Between Concussions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact of timing between the current and the most recent previous concussions on symptom severity among acutely concussed active duty military Service members (SMs). SETTING: Three military installations. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-four SMs aged 18 to 44 years who sustained a concussion within 72 hours of enrollment. No previous concussion within 1 year preenrollment. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with enrollment within 72 hours of injury, and follow-up at 1 week and 1 month postinjury. MAIN MEASURES: Lifetime concussion history (yes/no) and recency of the latest concussion (no history, relatively more recent [1 to <6 years ago], and more remote [6+ years ago]) from the current concussion using the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method-Interview Form. Symptom severity (total and by categories: cognitive, affective, somatosensory, vestibular) at all time points using the Neurobehavioral Symptoms Inventory. RESULTS: Concussion history assessed as having any previous concussion was not found significantly related to symptom severity (total or by categories) following a current concussion. However, when timing between concussion was taken into account, time since previous concussion was significantly related to symptomatology, whereby those with relatively more recent previous concussion had greater total symptoms within 72 hours of injury and at 1 week postinjury (though not at 1 month) than those with more remote previous concussion (≤72 hours: difference = 15.4, 95% CI = 1.8 to 29.1; 1 week: difference = 15.2, 95% CI = 1.2 to 29.2) or no history (≤72 hours: difference = 11.6, 95% CI = 0.4 to 22.8; 1 week: difference = 13.9, 95% CI = 2.4 to 25.4). When evaluated by symptom category, this relationship was particularly important on affective and somatosensory symptoms. CONCLUSION: In recently concussed active duty SMs, the timing between the current and previous concussions may be an important factor in determining prognosis. Clinical assessment of concussion history that accounts for the timing of the most recent event may be necessary to identify patients who may require a more conservative plan of care and more gradual return to activity in the acute recovery stage.

Intracranial Abnormalities Are Associated With Fewer Self-Reported Symptoms in Military Service Members Following Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between intracranial abnormalities (ICAs) and self-reported neurobehavioral and posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms in members of the military with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI). METHOD: Participants included 539 members of the US military with nonpenetrating msTBI. Self-reported neurobehavioral and PTS symptoms were assessed using the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory and the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version. ICAs were categorized as present/absent (by subtype) based upon medical record review. Spearman rank-order correlations and stepwise multiple regression analyses examined univariate and combined predictive relationships between ICAs and self-reported symptoms. RESULTS: The presence of any ICA was associated with reduced self-reported neurobehavioral and PTS symptoms. ICA-associated reductions were largest for PTS, followed by affective and cognitive neurobehavioral symptoms, and relatively weak for somatic/sensory and vestibular symptoms. Effects of different types of ICAs were comparable. Greater time since injury was related to greater symptom report, whereas duration of loss of consciousness and posttraumatic amnesia were not consistently related to self-reported symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that ICAs are associated with suppression of reported PTS and neurobehavioral symptoms-potentially via reduction in self-awareness. These findings support comprehensive, objective evaluation to identify impairments in self-awareness and functioning in msTBI patients.

Best Practices for Progressive Return to Activity after Concussion: Lessons Learned from a Prospective Study of U.S. Military Service Members.

Primary care providers can play a crucial role in the clinical management of concussion. However, many providers lack up-to-date information about best practices for rest and return to activity after these injuries. Most research on this topic has been conducted in athletes, and so less is known about how to assist patients with returning to activity in other settings and populations. This article provides a review of best practices for management of progressive return to activity after concussion, with an emphasis on "lessons learned" from the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) Progressive Return to Activity (PRA) study, a multi-site longitudinal research project conducted to evaluate concussion management practices and the effectiveness of provider training on DVBIC clinical recommendations (CRs). Provider clinical practices and patient outcomes were examined at three U.S. military treatment facilities before and after providers completed a standardized training on DVBIC PRA CRs. In summary, research findings provide additional support that concussion recovery can be influenced by patients' activity levels after injury. Patients with concussion may experience poorer outcomes if they return to pre-injury levels of activity too rapidly, but they may also be at risk for prolonged symptoms if they fail to increase activity levels over time after an initial period of rest. Additionally, training primary care providers in return to activity guidelines can result in more effective patient education and better clinical outcomes. This knowledge can be used to inform best practices for progressive return to activity in both civilian and military settings.

Use of a randomized clinical trial design to study cognitive rehabilitation approaches to enhance warfighter performance.

Within the military, cognitive readiness is essential to ensure the warfighter can return to highly demanding combat training and deployment operations. The warfighter must be able to make split second decisions and adapt to new tools and environments. After a traumatic brain injury, clinicians helping the warfighter must have techniques that address warfighter cognitive readiness. Current rehabilitation for cognitive complaints used in military medicine are modeled after civilian therapies which focus on remediating moderate to severe impairment through building compensatory strategies. This traditional approach to cognitive rehabilitation does not translate well to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) where impairments are subtle, nor does it meet the needs of our warfighters in deployed and combat training environments. Challenging our current methods is critical in adapting to the needs of this highly valued population to ensure that our warfighters are able to carry out mission critical decision making. Here we present a review of our best current practices for cognitive rehabilitation, describe the limitations our traditional approaches impose for mTBI in military personnel, and present an alternative treatment called Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART) that can be adopted through a randomized clinical trial design. We propose directly comparing traditional treatment approaches with a novel cognitive rehabilitation strategy which has been well validated outside of the military setting. Procedures were developed to execute this clinical trial in a way that is most relevant to the study population by establishing ecologically valid outcome metrics.

Resilience is associated with health-related quality of life in caregivers of service members and veterans following traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE: To examine factors related to resilience in military caregivers across caregiver health-related quality of life (HRQOL), caregiver sociodemographic variables, and service member/veteran (SMV) injury and health status. METHODS: Caregivers (N = 346, Female = 96.2%; Spouse = 91.0%; Age: M = 40.6 years, SD = 9.3) of SMVs following a mild, moderate, severe, or penetrating TBI were recruited from U.S. military treatment facilities and via community outreach. Caregivers completed select TBI-CareQOL and NIH Toolbox scales, the Caregiver Appraisal Scale, Caregiver Questionnaire, and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4. Caregivers were divided into three groups using the TBI-QOL Resilience scale: (1) Low-Moderate Resilience (n = 125), (2) Moderate Resilience (n = 122), and (3) Moderate-High Resilience (n = 99). RESULTS: Factors related to low caregiver resilience were strain on employment, financial burden from out-of-pocket expenses, caring for children, less personal time, caring for both verbal and physical irritability, anger, and aggression, and lower SMV functional ability (all p's < .05). The Low-Moderate Resilience group had consistently worse HRQOL scores compared to the Moderate and Moderate-High Resilience groups (ps < .001; d = .50-1.60), with the exception of Caregiving Ideology. CONCLUSION: Lower resilience among caregivers of SMVs following TBI is associated with poorer caregiver HRQOL. Programs aimed at promoting and maintaining resilience in military caregivers long-term is important for their own health, the health of the SMV, and the health of their children.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder is a Stronger Predictor of Long-Term Neurobehavioral Outcomes Than Traumatic Brain Injury Severity.

Concurrent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in military populations. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term neurobehavioral outcomes in service members and veterans (SMVs) with versus without PTSD symptoms following TBI of all severities. Participants were 536 SMVs prospectively enrolled from three military medical treatment facilities who were recruited into three experimental groups: TBI, injured controls (IC), and noninjured controls (NIC). Participants completed the PTSD Checklist, Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, and the TBI-Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) and were divided into six subgroups based on the three experimental categories, two PTSD categories (i.e., present vs. absent), and two broad TBI severity categories (unMTBI, which included uncomplicated mild TBI; and smcTBI, which included severe TBI, moderate TBI, and complicated mild TBI): (a) NIC/PTSD-absent, (b) IC/PTSD-absent, (c) unMTBI/PTSD-absent, (d) unMTBI/PTSD-present, (e) smcTBI/PTSD-absent, and (f) smcTBI/PTSD-present. There were significant main effects across the six groups for all TBI-QOL measures, ps < .001. Select pairwise comparisons revealed significantly lower scores, p < .001, on all TBI-QOL measures in the PTSD-present groups when compared to the PTSD-absent groups within the same TBI severity classification, ds = 0.90-2.11. In contrast, when controlling for PTSD, there were no significant differences among the TBI severity groups for any TBI-QOL measures. These results provide support for the strong influence of PTSD but not TBI severity on neurobehavioral outcomes following TBI. Concurrent PTSD and TBI of all severities should be considered a risk factor for poor long-term neurobehavioral outcomes that require ongoing monitoring.